Thursday 8 January 2015

The Gunmen in Paris Attacked More than a Muslim-baiting Magazine

The next question is what impact the murders will have on politics, writes Tony Barber

François Hollande, France’s president, rightly called it “an act of exceptional barbarity . . . against freedom of expression”. But the murder on Wednesday of 12 people at the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, a satirical magazine, will not surprise anyone familiar with the rising tensions among France’s 5m or more Muslim citizens and the poisonous legacy of French colonialism in north Africa.

For now, the perpetrators are unidentified. We need to keep in mind that the worst terrorist outrage in Europe of recent years, the murder of 77 people in Norway in 2011, was committed not by Islamist militants but by a far-right fanatic, Anders Behring Breivik.

Like other politically motivated attacks, from 9/11 to the killing last May of four people at the Jewish museum in Brussels, the atrocity at Charlie Hebdo was despicable and indefensible. Among the first to condemn it was the French Council of the Muslim Faith, which termed it “a barbaric act against democracy and freedom of the press”.

Charlie Hebdo is a bastion of the French tradition of hard-hitting satire. It has a long record of mocking, baiting and needling Muslims. Two years ago the magazine published a 65-page strip cartoon book portraying the Prophet’s life. And this week it gave special coverage to Soumission (“Submission”), a new novel by Michel Houellebecq, the idiosyncratic author, which depicts France in the grip of an Islamic regime led by a Muslim president.

This is not in the slightest to condone the murderers, who must be caught and punished, or to suggest that freedom of expression should not extend to satirical portrayals of religion. It is merely to say that some common sense would be useful at publications such as Charlie Hebdo, and Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten, which purport to strike a blow for freedom when they provoke Muslims.

Emotions are understandably high in France, where the next question is what impact Wednesday’s murders will have on the political climate, and in particular the fortunes of Marine Le Pen and her far-right National Front. Anti-Islamism is part of the electoral attraction of a party that topped the polls in May in France’s European Parliament elections.

Ms Le Pen has taken care to distance her party from the anti-Semitism that stained it and limited its appeal under her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen. But she has left anti-Islamism in place and even reinforced it.

In 2010 Ms Le Pen compared Muslims praying in the streets to the 1940-44 Nazi occupation of France. Less than 18 months later she collected 17.9 per cent of the vote in France’s presidential election. She has a good chance of increasing her share of the vote enough to win the first round — though not the second, decisive round — of the 2017 election.

Anti-Islamism and a hard line on immigration will shore up Ms Le Pen’s core vote, but they will not unlock the doors of the Elysée Palace. Surveys show that a majority of French people rejects racism and dislikes extremism.

The English author Andrew Hussey, who lives in Paris, published a book last year called The French Intifada, in which he described France as “the world capital of liberty, equality and fraternity . . . under attack from the angry and dispossessed heirs to the French colonial project”.

The murders in Paris throw down a challenge to French politicians and citizens to stand up for the republic’s core values and defeat political violence without succumbing to the siren songs of the far right.

tony.barber@ft.com. The Europe Editor of the Financial Times.
This article is an expanded and updated version of an earlier blog posted on January 7. Last updated: January 7, 2015 7:07 pm

Satire, Terrorism & Freedom of Speech.

So far 17 people have lost their lives unnecessarily; extremists found an excuse to use more violence; freedom is being curtailed as security concerns rise further, with hatred and resentment spreading across boundaries in France and the international community – and all done in the name of freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech is an important element of liberal thought and fundamental to a liberal democracy. But does freedom not come with responsibility? Does it not make sense that living in an interconnected world of diverse cultures, values and practices, citizens of this planet should respect those who are different from them? What do we gain from increasing tension in a world that more than ever needs peace and prosperity? Possibly the reasons for such developments have nothing to do with the freedom debate, but more to do with suppression of identities.

Words and images just like guns and explosives are expressions of power relations in society.
Language, conceptual frameworks and paradigms are prone to self-fulfilling prophecies and shape the world we live in. The process of identification and the construction of identity are a form of power and act of violation: whoever controls identity, has profound influence over the destiny and life of an individual, group or society. It seems this is what was at stake between the French satirical weekly’s mocking of Islamic beliefs and the extremists who thought violence would redress the balance.

Racism in the past based its arguments on colour, genes and IQ. Then as colonies gained independence, the discourse focused on the new states lacking the knowledge to run their societies and being corrupt and wasteful. Now in the post-Cold War era our liberal values have allowed us to preach human rights and democracy to others while we abuse them ourselves at home and abroad. The discourse changes as time passes but the truth remains that we are always the ones with superior values. Neither Charlie Hebdo nor the terrorists have contributed to freedom of speech.
  • Charlie Hebdo has announced that it will bring out a special edition on Wednesday 14 January 2015, with a three million-copy print run, which will “naturally” include new cartoons of Islam’s holy Prophet Muhammad. The issue will reportedly be translated into 16 languages with many copies available outside France. The French government has deployed 15,000 troops in case this provokes a backlash.

‘Extremists more offensive to Islam than cartoons’.

Islamic extremists following a ‘takfiri’ ideology are more offensive to the Prophet Mohammed than Western satirical cartoons, chief of the Lebanese military faction Hezbollah, Hasan Nasrallah, said following the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack.

"The behavior of the takfiri groups that claim to follow Islam have distorted Islam, the Koran and the Muslim nation more than Islam’s enemies ... who insulted the prophet in films... or drew cartoons of the prophet," the Hezbollah leader said in a televised speech to mark the birthday of the Prophet Mohammed, according to Lebanon’s Daily Star.

Nasrallah went on to say that “Takfiris are the biggest threat to Islam, as a religion [and] as a message.”

The Charlie Hebdo terror attack should be taken as “revenge for the honor” of Islam’s prophet, according to a source allegedly belonging to Yemen’s branch of Al-Qaeda, who wrote to several news outlets with the message.

Hamas also released a statement in French on Saturday, in which it also condemned the Charlie Hebdo attack: “Differences of opinion and thought cannot justify murder," the group said in a statement, cited by AFP.
Extracts from: Russia Today, January 10, 2015 08:33.


Pope Francis says freedom  of speech has limits


Speaking to journalists flying with him to the Philippines on Thursday, Pope said that there should be limits to the freedom of expression. He also said last week's attacks were an "aberration", and such horrific violence in God's name could not be justified.

The pontiff said religions had to be treated with respect, so that people's faiths was not insulted or ridiculed. He added that there should be limits and restrictions on offending and ridiculing the beliefs and faiths of others.

To illustrate his point, he told journalists that his assistant could expect a punch if he cursed his mother. "If my good friend Doctor Gasparri [who organises the Pope's trips] speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched," he said, throwing a pretend punch at the doctor, who was standing beside him. "You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit."

Earlier President Francois Hollande vowed to protect Muslims who, he said, were the main victims of fanaticism, along with people of other religions. President Hollande: "Muslims are the first victims of fanaticism, fundamentalism and intolerance". Speaking at the Arab World Institute, he said anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic acts should be condemned and punished.

15 January 2015  BBC


 

No comments:

Post a Comment