President Obama on Thursday called to congratulate Netanyahu
on his victory, but also chided the Israeli leader for declaring just days
before his election he would not support the creation of a Palestinian state.
Obama told Netanyahu the U.S.
would “need to reassess our options” regarding
relations with Israel, according to a White House official. He also took
issue with Netanyahu’s warning to his supporters about Arab-Israeli citizens
voting in high numbers, the official said.
The White House has called those comments “cynical” and “divisive.” In multiple interviews, Netanyahu
has walked back his comments about Palestinian
statehood. It remains unclear how far the White House is willing to go to
punish Netanyahu for his campaign, which included a controversial address to
Congress that dozens of Democrats boycotted.
The White House has hewed to a
tough line, stating repeatedly that the U.S-Israel relationship might be
altered by Netanyahu’s remark about a two-state solution. “I think
they’re trying to send a very specific and tough message to Prime
Minister Netanyahu, which is, ‘We’ve paid
attention to the words you’ve used during the campaign and if
they are in fact going to be your policy, they will have an impact on our
relationship,’” said Daniel Kurtzer, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel
under George W. Bush who is now a professor of Middle Eastern policy studies at
Princeton University. “It’s a shot across the bow,” added
Kurtzer, who said the White House’s warnings “should be
taken quite seriously.”
White House officials say no
decisions have been made about policy changes with regards to Israel. Press
secretary Josh Earnest and others have floated the possibility that the U.S.
will not veto some resolutions at the United Nations Security Council that are
deemed hostile to Israel. That includes language designed to pressure Israel
into accepting a Palestinian state and condemning Israeli settlement
activity.
Netanyahu’s comments
from before the election show that support for a two-state solution “is a view
that’s not shared by the Israeli prime minister, at least it’s unclear
whether or not he holds that view anymore,” Earnest
said Friday.
The last time the U.S. backed a
U.N. resolution against Israel was in 1981,
when President Ronald Reagan supported a measure condemning Israel's strike on
an Iraqi nuclear reactor.
Obama’s dispute
with Netanyahu has angered Republicans on Capitol Hill and put pro-Israel
Democrats in a tough spot.
Should the administration change
its Israel policy, the backlash from members of both parties could be intense. Rep.
Brad Sherman (D-Calif.), a senior member of the House Foreign Affairs
Committee, said he suspects the administration is bluffing about its U.N.
threat. If “there’s a
resolution hostile to Israel, I would expect that this administration would
veto it,” Sherman told BuzzFeed. Sen. Charles Schumer
(D-N.Y.) also said in a statement to The Weekly Standard he “expects” the U.S. to continue backing Israel at
the U.N.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
(D-Calif.) said she was “near tears” after
Netanyahu’s address to Congress earlier this month, in which he
criticized Obama’s efforts to broker a nuclear deal with Iran.
But Pelosi on Wednesday softened her rhetoric, saying she respects the
results of Israel’s election and pledged the U.S. would continue to work with
the Jewish state. “It doesn’t depend
on personalities,” Pelosi said of U.S.-Israel relations. “It’s about
values that we share. And we look forward to continuing our work together.”
The White House is not willing to
put everything on the table when it comes to re-evaluating its policy toward
Israel. Earnest said the reassessment “will have no impact” on
security cooperation with Israel. The U.S. has provided almost $100 billion in
military aid to Israel over the past five decades.
Pro-Israel groups have urged Obama
to put his dispute with Netanyahu to rest. The American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, which has been at odds with Obama over Netanyahu and Iran, urged the president to mend ties with his
Israeli counterpart. “Unfortunately, administration spokespersons rebuffed
the prime minister’s efforts to improve the understandings between Israel and
the U.S,” the group said in a statement. “In
contrast to their comments, we urge the administration to further strengthen
ties with America’s most reliable and only truly democratic ally in the Middle
East.”
White House chief of staff Denis
McDonough on Monday will deliver a keynote address to the national conference
of J Street, a group that has positioned itself as an alternative to AIPAC and
has been critical of Netanyahu. By Jordan Fabian, The Hill - 03/20/15 06:06 PM EDT
No comments:
Post a Comment