French economist Thomas Piketty, the
best-selling author of Capital in the 21st Century, has turned down France's
top award, the Legion D'Honneur. (BBC, 1 January 2015)
"I have just learned that
I was nominated for the Legion D'Honneur. I refuse this nomination because I do
not think it is the government's role to decide who is honourable," Piketty
told the news agency AFP. His book examines income
inequality in society and became a surprise hit, topping the bestseller list in
the US. Capital has been described by the prominent economist Paul Krugman as "the most important
economics book of the year - and maybe of the decade".
Last year, cartoonist Jacques Tardi also
turned down the Legion D'Honneur. Among those to have refused the award are
philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre and radiology pioneers Pierre and Marie Curie.
The question is what governments or
international organisations such as the Nobel Prize Committee achieve by
awarding ‘honours’ to prominent individuals: who is honouring who?! The Nobel
Peace Prize was given to the US President Obama in 2009 as he took office, a
man who would lead regime change in Libya and seek to overthrow Syria’s
President Assad while continuing to support Israeli occupation of Palestinian
lands.
The European Union was also awarded the Nobel
Peace Prize in 2012 in the midst of its financial / economic problems for its
contribution to the advancement
of peace
in Europe in the past six decades. It is important to remember that the main EU
powers were responsible for paving the way for the disintegration of Yugoslavia
in the early 1990s and are currently siding with the US against Russia over the
situation in Ukraine. This could lead to a third Cold War between Russia and
the West if the demonisation of Russia continues.
Finally, among those honoured, there are those who use their
award to recover lost prestige. James Watson, the
world-famous biologist who was shunned by the scientific community after
linking intelligence to race, said he is selling his Nobel Prize because he is
short of money after being made a pariah. Watson, who shared the 1962 Nobel
Prize for uncovering the double helix structure of DNA, sparked an outcry in
2007 when he suggested that people of African descent were inherently less
intelligent than white people.
He told the Financial
Times he had
become an “unperson” after he “was outed as believing in IQ” in 2007 and said
he would like to use money from the sale to buy a David Hockney painting. (The
Daily Telegraph, 24 November 2014). The Russia entrepreneur,
Alisher Usmanov, paid $4.1m
(£2.6m) for Watson’s medal at an auction at Christie’s in New
York City in November and returned the medal to Watson.
Sartre letter
delivered late to Nobel Foundation
A
letter sent by renowned French philosopher, Jean-Paul Sartre, asking not to be
considered for the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1964 was delivered too late to
the Nobel Foundation, newly-released documents show.
According
to the Swedish media on Saturday, the newly-released documents showed that
Sartre’s letter was delivered to the Sweden-based academy on October 14, 1964,
a month after he was appointed as the award’s top candidate.
The
letter’s late delivery turned Sartre into the only figure in the history of the
award, who willingly refused the world’s most prestigious literary award.
In
the letter, Sartre had asked the academy to remove him from the list of Nobel
candidates, saying he “always declined official honors” because they would
curtail his freedom as an independent philosopher and thus would
institutionalize him.
Sartre
said in his letter that he would not accept the prize “either in 1964 or in the
future.”
The
historical documents regarding the letter’s late delivery were recently
released after the end of the 50-year time span required before confidential
documents can be publicized.
Sartre
(1905-1980), considered by many as one of the greatest philosophers of the
twentieth century, is known throughout the world by his school of thought,
Existentialism.
Existentialism
is a philosophical doctrine that places man at the center of the world in the
humanistic tradition. The philosophy stresses that each person is the product
of his or her decisions and thus can never escape responsibility for his or her
character, deeds and words, thus rejecting the naturalist notion that human beings
are inescapably predetermined by their heredity and environment.
Press
TV, Sat Jan 3, 2015 3:24PM
No comments:
Post a Comment