The next question is what impact the murders will have on politics, writes Tony Barber
François
Hollande, France’s president, rightly called it “an act of exceptional
barbarity . . . against freedom of expression”. But the murder on Wednesday of 12 people at
the Paris offices of Charlie Hebdo, a satirical magazine, will not surprise
anyone familiar with the rising tensions among France’s 5m or more Muslim
citizens and the poisonous legacy of French colonialism in north Africa.
For now, the
perpetrators are unidentified. We need to keep in mind that the worst terrorist
outrage in Europe of recent years, the murder of 77 people in Norway in 2011,
was committed not by Islamist militants but by a far-right fanatic, Anders
Behring Breivik.
Like other politically
motivated attacks, from 9/11 to the killing last May of four people at the
Jewish museum in Brussels, the atrocity at Charlie Hebdo was despicable and
indefensible. Among the first to condemn it was the French Council of the
Muslim Faith, which termed it “a barbaric act against democracy and freedom of
the press”.
Charlie Hebdo is a
bastion of the French tradition of hard-hitting satire. It has a long record of
mocking, baiting and needling Muslims. Two years ago the magazine published a
65-page strip cartoon book portraying the Prophet’s life. And this week it gave
special coverage to Soumission (“Submission”), a new novel by Michel
Houellebecq, the idiosyncratic author, which depicts France in the grip of an
Islamic regime led by a Muslim president.
This is not in the
slightest to condone the murderers, who must be caught and punished, or to
suggest that freedom of expression should not extend to satirical portrayals of
religion. It is merely to say that some common sense would be useful at
publications such as Charlie Hebdo, and Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten, which
purport to strike a blow for freedom when they provoke Muslims.
Emotions are
understandably high in France, where the next question is what impact
Wednesday’s murders will have on the political climate, and in particular the
fortunes of Marine Le Pen and her far-right National Front. Anti-Islamism is
part of the electoral attraction of a party that topped the polls in May in
France’s European Parliament elections.
Ms Le Pen has taken
care to distance her party from the anti-Semitism that stained it and limited
its appeal under her father, Jean-Marie Le Pen. But she has left anti-Islamism
in place and even reinforced it.
In 2010 Ms Le Pen
compared Muslims praying in the streets to the 1940-44 Nazi occupation of
France. Less than 18 months later she collected 17.9 per cent of the vote in
France’s presidential election. She has a good chance of increasing her share
of the vote enough to win the first round — though not the second, decisive
round — of the 2017 election.
Anti-Islamism and a
hard line on immigration will shore up Ms Le Pen’s core vote, but they will not
unlock the doors of the Elysée Palace. Surveys show that a majority of French
people rejects racism and dislikes extremism.
The English author
Andrew Hussey, who lives in Paris, published a book last year called The French Intifada, in which
he described France as “the world capital of liberty, equality and
fraternity . . . under attack from the angry and dispossessed heirs to the
French colonial project”.
The murders in Paris
throw down a challenge to French politicians and citizens to stand up for the
republic’s core values and defeat political violence without succumbing to the
siren songs of the far right.
tony.barber@ft.com. The Europe Editor of the Financial Times.
This article is an expanded
and updated version of an earlier blog posted on January 7. Last updated: January 7, 2015 7:07 pm
Satire, Terrorism & Freedom of Speech.
So far 17 people have lost their lives unnecessarily;
extremists found an excuse to use more violence; freedom is being curtailed as
security concerns rise further, with hatred and resentment spreading across
boundaries in France and the international community – and all done in the name
of freedom of speech.
Freedom of speech is an important element of liberal thought
and fundamental to a liberal democracy. But does freedom not come with
responsibility? Does it not make sense that living in an interconnected world
of diverse cultures, values and practices, citizens of this planet should
respect those who are different from them? What do we gain from increasing
tension in a world that more than ever needs peace and prosperity? Possibly the
reasons for such developments have nothing to do with the freedom debate, but
more to do with suppression of identities.
Words and images just like guns and explosives are
expressions of power relations in society.
Language,
conceptual frameworks and paradigms are prone to self-fulfilling prophecies and shape the
world we live in. The process
of identification and the construction of identity are a form of power and act
of violation: whoever controls identity, has profound influence over the
destiny and life of an individual, group or society. It seems this is what was
at stake between the French satirical weekly’s mocking of Islamic beliefs and
the extremists who thought violence would redress the balance.
Racism in the past based its arguments on colour, genes and
IQ. Then as colonies gained independence, the discourse focused on the new
states lacking the knowledge to run their societies and being corrupt and
wasteful. Now in the post-Cold War era our liberal values have allowed us to
preach human rights and democracy to others while we abuse them ourselves at
home and abroad. The discourse changes as time passes but the truth remains
that we are always the ones with superior values. Neither Charlie Hebdo nor the
terrorists have contributed to freedom of speech.
‘Extremists more offensive to Islam than cartoons’.
Islamic extremists following a ‘takfiri’ ideology are more offensive to the Prophet Mohammed than Western satirical cartoons, chief of the Lebanese military faction Hezbollah, Hasan Nasrallah, said following the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack.
15 January 2015 BBC
- Charlie Hebdo has announced that it will bring out a special edition on Wednesday 14 January 2015, with a three million-copy print run, which will “naturally” include new cartoons of Islam’s holy Prophet Muhammad. The issue will reportedly be translated into 16 languages with many copies available outside France. The French government has deployed 15,000 troops in case this provokes a backlash.
Islamic extremists following a ‘takfiri’ ideology are more offensive to the Prophet Mohammed than Western satirical cartoons, chief of the Lebanese military faction Hezbollah, Hasan Nasrallah, said following the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack.
"The
behavior of the takfiri groups that claim to follow Islam have distorted Islam,
the Koran and the Muslim nation more than Islam’s enemies ... who insulted the
prophet in films... or drew cartoons of the prophet," the Hezbollah leader said in a
televised speech to mark the birthday of the Prophet Mohammed, according to
Lebanon’s Daily Star.
Nasrallah
went on to say that “Takfiris
are the biggest threat to Islam, as a religion [and] as a message.”
The
Charlie Hebdo terror attack should be taken as “revenge
for the honor” of Islam’s
prophet, according to a source allegedly belonging to Yemen’s branch of
Al-Qaeda, who wrote to several news outlets with the message.
Hamas also
released a statement in French on Saturday, in which it also condemned the
Charlie Hebdo attack: “Differences of opinion and thought cannot justify
murder," the group said
in a statement, cited by AFP.
Extracts from: Russia
Today, January
10, 2015 08:33.Pope Francis says freedom of speech has limits
Speaking
to journalists flying with him to the Philippines on
Thursday, Pope said that there should be limits to the freedom of expression.
He also said last week's attacks were an "aberration", and such
horrific violence in God's name could not be justified.
The
pontiff said religions had to be treated with respect, so that people's faiths
was not insulted or ridiculed. He added that there should be limits
and restrictions on offending and ridiculing the beliefs and faiths of others.
To
illustrate his point, he told journalists that his assistant could expect a
punch if he cursed his mother. "If my good friend Doctor Gasparri [who
organises the Pope's trips] speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get
punched," he said, throwing a pretend punch at the doctor, who was
standing beside him. "You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of
others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit."
Earlier
President Francois Hollande vowed to protect Muslims who, he said, were the
main victims of fanaticism, along with people of other religions. President Hollande: "Muslims
are the first victims of fanaticism, fundamentalism and intolerance". Speaking
at the Arab World Institute, he said anti-Muslim and anti-Semitic acts should
be condemned and punished.
No comments:
Post a Comment